Wolverhampton (AW) win rate by stall & distance
Each row splits the draw into low, middle and high thirds relative to the field size, then shows how often each third actually wins. With no draw bias every third would win ~33%.
The same engine behind these 5,436 Wolverhampton (AW) races scores every runner here each morning. Get the pick of the day free on Telegram — no card, no spam.
Verified 34.8% strike on our maximum-confidence bets — every result logged, win or lose.
Get free Wolverhampton (AW) picks on Telegram →| Distance | Races | Low stalls win | Middle | High stalls win |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5f–6f (sprints) | 1,680 | 31% | 35% | 34% |
| 7f–8f (mile) | 1,203 | 30% | 37% | 33% |
| 9f–12f (middle) | 2,258 | 26% | 36% | 38% |
| 13f+ (staying) | 295 | 23% | 35% | 42% |
Green = a meaningful edge (≥6 points above the opposite third). Figures from our settled-results database, all Wolverhampton (AW) races with 8+ runners.
How to use this
If a distance shows a strong high- or low-draw edge, it's a genuine factor to weigh — a well-drawn horse gets a head start, a badly-drawn one needs to be good enough to overcome it. Our model already bakes draw into every Wolverhampton (AW) selection, so you don't have to: see today's Wolverhampton (AW) tips, or the full Wolverhampton (AW) form guide.
Why trust these numbers
This isn't a pundit's hunch. It's every Wolverhampton (AW) race in our database, settled from official results, recomputed automatically. The same engine that measures this draw bias scores every runner at Wolverhampton (AW) each morning — logged before the off, win or lose, on our public track record.